RE: Router-ids in the lab

From: Mohammad Khan (ahmadwa@yahoo.com)
Date: Sat Apr 12 2003 - 14:26:59 GMT-3


I used 1's and 2's under OSPF and BGP, and it really
helped.

R1#
router ospf 1
 router-id 1.1.1.1

router bgp 64512
 bgp router-id 1.1.1.1

As you mentioned, do not route these.

A. Khan, CCIE #11146

--- Charles Church <cchurch@wamnet.com> wrote:
> I wouldn't bother with overriding the RIDs. The
> RIDs the lab routers will
> default to aren't ambiguous at all. You don't want
> to do anything that the
> proctor might not catch and take points away for.
>
> Chuck Church
> CCIE #8776, MCNE, MCSE
> Wam!Net Government Services
> 13665 Dulles Technology Dr. Ste 250
> Herndon, VA 20171
> Office: 703-480-2569
> Cell: 585-233-2706
> cchurch@wamnet.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> Rick
> Sent: Friday, April 11, 2003 8:28 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Router-ids in the lab
>
>
> All,
>
> I like using my own OSPF and BGP router-ids that
> help trouble-shoot really
> fast. Do you think they would count points off for
> using these?
>
> For example:
> r1 router-id 1.1.1.1
> r2 router-id 2.2.2.2
>
> * These are note routed in any, but just used as a
> router-ids.
>
> Please give your advise. All advise is good advise.
>
> Thanks,
> Rick



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu May 01 2003 - 13:35:51 GMT-3