From: Scott Morris (swm@emanon.com)
Date: Mon Mar 10 2003 - 01:17:44 GMT-3
I don't think the F1 is "added" per se, but being that the command (F0)
isn't reachable, it would stand to reason that a response (F1) wouldn't
accomplish anything in a bidirectional/crippled conversation!
I haven't set it up for any debugs to verify my logic though.
Scott
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Peter
Sent: Sunday, March 09, 2003 3:42 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: dlsw filter
You are basically telling all your DLSW peers that you cannot reach SAPs
F0 and F1 (reason for F1 is that whatever saps you put in the config add
1 and these will also be included as unreachable). So your peers should
not bother sending NetBIOS traffic to you since you don't have anybody
supporting it (you said "icannotreach").
_____________________________
Peter
#7247 (R&S, Security)
CyscoExpert Corp.
4433 W. Touhy Ave. Suite 410
Lincolnwood, IL 60712
Phone (847) 674-3392
Toll Free (866) CyscoXP (297-2697)
Fax (847) 674-2625
----- Original Message -----
From: "pita40" <pita40@hotmail.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Sunday, March 09, 2003 11:54 AM
Subject: dlsw filter
> Question.
> Deny netbios explorer to r5. Do the config on R5.
> R5 and R1 are connected back to back.
>
> I see an article on a website that says the answer is
>
> r5(config)# dlsw icannotreach sap F0
>
> I am unsure of this answer or why this is the answer.
>
> Please help.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 05 2003 - 08:51:36 GMT-3