From: Brian Dennis (brian@labforge.com)
Date: Mon Mar 10 2003 - 03:06:46 GMT-3
It's only the login to the management interface to the CCIE racks that I
own. Currently the racks are being used by students from private classes
I've taught.
As far as classes go in the very near future there will be an
announcement (dates, locations, etc) for the public classes I will be
teaching. I will be teaching two types of R&S CCIE prep classes. If you
are interested let me know and I'll shoot you an e-mail with more
details.
Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (R&S/ISP Dial/Security)
brian@labforge.com
http://www.labforge.com
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Jonathan V Hays
Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2003 11:10 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Re: atm ilmi-pvc-discovery
Brian,
A big public THANKS!! to you for all the clear, insightful posts.
You've said before that you teach classes. Could you provide more
information on the services you offer? Your http://www.labforge.com URL
seems to go directly to a login page with no links to information. And
if you feel it is not appropriate to post your offering on groupstudy
please email me directly.
Thanks.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On
> Behalf Of Brian Dennis
> Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2003 1:26 PM
> To: 'stefan vogt'; ccielab@groupstudy.com; 'Peter'
> Subject: RE: Re: atm ilmi-pvc-discovery
>
>
> Stefan,
> You have it right. The "atm ilmi-pvc-discovery" command with
> the "subinterface" option is used to automatically map the
> PVC to a subinterface and isn't intended to be removed. In
> your case you discovered the 9/120 PVC and the command
> automatically assigned it to the .9 subinterface (VPI =
> subinterface #).
>
> Your issue is something different. The PVC (VPI/VCI) was
> assigned to a multipoint subinterface which means a method to
> "map" layer 3 (IP
> address) to layer 2 (ATM VPI/VCI) is needed. You could use
> InARP or manually map the layer 3 address to the layer 2
> address. If a point-to-point subinterface was used no mapping
> would be needed as all layer 3 addresses are "mapped" to the
> one layer 2 address.
>
> As a side note when using this command in the real world I've
> always used it with point-to-point subinterfaces.
>
> Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (R&S/ISP Dial/Security)
> brian@labforge.com http://www.labforge.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 05 2003 - 08:51:36 GMT-3