From: Khalid A. Kaseb (khalid_ameen@rayaintegration.com)
Date: Wed Feb 26 2003 - 14:15:50 GMT-3
This is for untagged traffic which sourced by the PC
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Tim Fletcher
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 4:57 PM
To: Ong Boon Hui; Cezar Fistik; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: voice vlans correct configuration
What's the purpose of the "switchport access vlan 10"? Since it's in
trunk
mode that should be irrelevant (but harmless).
-Tim Fletcher
At 12:02 PM 2/26/2003 +0800, Ong Boon Hui wrote:
>Hi,
>
>How about the following: -
>
>Inferface fa 0/1
>switchport access vlan 10
>switchport trunk native vlan 10
>switchport voice vlan 100
>switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
>switchport mode trunk
>
>
>Debarros
>
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Cezar Fistik" <cfistik@moldovacc.md>
>To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 10:57 AM
>Subject: voice vlans correct configuration
>
>
> > Hi group,
> >
> > Could you please, share your ideas about the following
configurations.
>Just
> > assume that an ip phone is connected to int fast 0/10 and to the
phone is
> > connected a pc that is supposed to be in vlan 10
> >
> > 1.
> > mls qos
> > !
> > interface fastethernet 0/10
> > switchport mode access
> > switchport access vlan 10
> > switchport voice vlan 100
> > mls qos trust cos
> >
> > 2.
> > mls qos
> > !
> > interface fastethernet 0/10
> > switchport mode trunk
> > switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
> > switchport voice vlan 100
> > mls qos trust cos
> >
> > Which one do you think is correct? Or if they are both incorect I'll
> > appreciate any advice.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Cezar Fistik
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Mar 01 2003 - 11:06:37 GMT-3