From: Larry Letterman (lletterm@cisco.com)
Date: Wed Feb 26 2003 - 05:48:04 GMT-3
I dont think thats what he wants to do..
All he has to do is configure other ethernet interfaces and
put them in the routing
process....
Larry Letterman
Network Engineer
Cisco Systems
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mohamed Nizam" <torontocisco@yahoo.ca>
To: "sam" <sam@avtechusa.com>
Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 11:02 PM
Subject: Re: Frame Relay
> Yes. You can configure one of the serial interface as
terminating
> FRame-relay interface. You can enter a frame relay
statement & an IP Address
> on that interface. If you can send the config , I can
modify and send back
> to you.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mohamed Nizam,
>
> A proud student of WinNET Harith.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "sam" <sam@avtechusa.com>
> To: "'Mohamed Nizam'" <torontocisco@yahoo.ca>
> Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 5:26 PM
> Subject: RE: Frame Relay
>
>
> > Hi, all! I understand from the previous posts on this
group that you can
> > configure the frame relay switch to also perform layer 3
routing
> > functions.
> >
> > I believe someone also mentioned that they use their
frame-relay switch
> > as a backbone router to inject routes into their
topology.
> >
> > I have a 4000 series router configured as my frame-relay
switch. It is
> > running IOS v10. Will I be able to configure my 4000 as
a BB router as
> > well?
> >
> > The reason I ask is because I am away from home for a
while and I do not
> > have access to my router to configure it.
> >
> > Thanks for any input.
> >
> > Sam Sena
> > Chief Microsoft Trainer
> > MCT, MCSE, MCDBA, CCNP
> > Avtech Technologies
> >
> > 4500 New Brunswick Ave
> > Piscataway NJ
> > (732) 424-8008 (o)
> > (732) 424-7388 (f)
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com
[mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> > Mohamed Nizam
> > Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 4:09 PM
> > To: Cheng Qian
> > Cc: Vijay S Jayaraman; Larry Letterman; Bobby;
ccielab@groupstudy.com;
> > nobody@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: Re: Frame Relay
> >
> > You are correct.
> >
> > Harith.
> >
> > A proud student of WinNET Harith.
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Cheng Qian" <toqian@cisco.com>
> > To: "Mohamed Nizam" <torontocisco@yahoo.ca>
> > Cc: "Vijay S Jayaraman" <vjayaram@in.ibm.com>; "Larry
Letterman"
> > <lletterm@cisco.com>; "Bobby" <bobby1@ctimail3.com>;
> > <ccielab@groupstudy.com>; <nobody@groupstudy.com>
> > Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 9:20 AM
> > Subject: Re: Frame Relay
> >
> >
> > > For your second way to setup, if you did not enable
frame-relay
> > switching
> > > on R6, it won't allow you to configure it with
frame-relay intfp-type
> > dce.
> > >
> > >
> > > At 08:17 AM 2/21/2003 -0500, Mohamed Nizam wrote:
> > > >There are two kind of Frame relay set-up.
> > > >
> > > >1. Frame relay thorough a FR-Switch. R5------ s0-
FR-S -s1----- R6.
> > > > This is what we most of the time
practice. The middle
> > router
> > is
> > > >configured as FR- Switch. Usually we connect Cable's
DCE side to
> > FR-Sw.
> > But
> > > >it is not mandatory. If so the config of the switch
will be
> > > >
> > > >frame switching
> > > >
> > > >int s0
> > > > encap frame
> > > > clock rate 56000
> > > > frame intf-type dce
> > > > frame route 506 int s 1 605
> > > >
> > > >int s1
> > > > encap frame
> > > > clock rate 56000
> > > > frame intf-type dce
> > > > frame route 605 int s 0 506
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >2. Terminating Frame Relay .
R5 -S1--------------------S0/0-R6
> > > >
> > > > No switch is between them. Then one side of the
link should be
> > frame
> > > >intf-type dce. ( Cable DCE end , and thsi not
necessary to be match.
> > ) .
> > > >Also both sides DLCI numbers can be same or
different.
> > > >
> > > > R5
> > > > interface Serial1
> > > > ip address 200.100.2.1 255.255.255.0
> > > > encapsulation frame-relay
> > > > frame-relay map ip 200.100.2.2 102 broadcast
> > > >
> > > > R6
> > > > interface Serial0/0
> > > > ip address 200.100.2.2 255.255.255.0
> > > > encapsulation frame-relay
> > > > clockrate 64000
> > > > frame intf-type dce
> > > > frame-relay map ip 200.100.2.1 201 broadcast
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >Thanks,
> > > >
> > > >Mohamed Nizam
> > > >
> > > >" A proud student of Harith"
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >----- Original Message -----
> > > >From: "Vijay S Jayaraman" <vjayaram@in.ibm.com>
> > > >To: "Larry Letterman" <lletterm@cisco.com>
> > > >Cc: "Bobby" <bobby1@ctimail3.com>;
<ccielab@groupstudy.com>;
> > > ><nobody@groupstudy.com>
> > > >Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 4:50 AM
> > > >Subject: Re: Frame Relay
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > A frame relay back to back should work....if you
enable "frame
> > relay
> > > > > switching" on the dce side, add the "clock-rate"
command on the
> > dce
> > > > > interface, add "frame relay intf-type dce" to the
dce end and have
> > the
> > > > > DLCIs at both the connecting interfaces....
> > > > >
> > > > > But I doubt whether you would ever have the
oppurtunity to do this
> > in
> > an
> > > > > actual lab because all the routers connect only
through the frame
> > relay
> > > > > switch and you are not allowed to touch that.....
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Vijay.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > "Larry Letterman"
> > > > > <lletterm@cisco.c To:
"Bobby"
> > > ><bobby1@ctimail3.com>, <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > > > > om> cc:
> > > > > Sent by:
Subject: Re: Frame
> > Relay
> > > > > nobody@groupstudy
> > > > > .com
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > 02/21/2003 01:02
> > > > > PM
> > > > > Please respond to
> > > > > "Larry Letterman"
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I'd be surprised if your config works..which one
is the DTE
> > > > > and which is the DCE..
> > > > > I have a frame switch setup in my lab which
works..and the
> > > > > frame switch uses frame relay
> > > > > routing and DCE/Clock rate commands..
> > > > >
> > > > > Also the Lab as I understand it is already
configured for
> > > > > things like that..we should only have to configure
the
> > > > > routers that connect to each other..altho people
have said
> > > > > here and elsewhere that it might be in my interest
> > > > > to know how to set up a frame switch...
> > > > >
> > > > > Larry Letterman
> > > > > Network Engineer
> > > > > Cisco Systems
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > From: "Bobby" <bobby1@ctimail3.com>
> > > > > To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > > > > Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 6:01 PM
> > > > > Subject: Frame Relay
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Friends,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If in the lab we were asked to configure a back
to back fr
> > > > > connection
> > > > > > whether the following config is ok :
> > > > > >
> > > > > > R5
> > > > > > interface Serial1
> > > > > > ip address 200.100.2.1 255.255.255.0
> > > > > > encapsulation frame-relay
> > > > > > no keepalive
> > > > > > frame-relay map ip 200.100.2.2 102 broadcast
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > R6
> > > > > > interface Serial0/0
> > > > > > ip address 200.100.2.2 255.255.255.0
> > > > > > encapsulation frame-relay
> > > > > > no keepalive
> > > > > > clockrate 64000
> > > > > > frame-relay map ip 200.100.2.1 102 broadcast
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I was told that they will not accept the above
config. Is
> > > > > there
> > > > > > any other way do it.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks
> > > >
> > >
> >
>___________________________________________________________
___________
> > > >Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca
> >
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Mar 01 2003 - 11:06:36 GMT-3