Re: Voice Vlan

From: Jerry (phase90@comcast.net)
Date: Mon Feb 24 2003 - 23:35:46 GMT-3

Next message: mike mike: "Documentation CD Outdated"
Previous message: aansar@sscomp.com.sg: "Re: ISIS and OSPF redist"
Maybe in reply to: Bobby: "Voice Vlan"
Next in thread: Umair Hoodbhoy: "RE: Voice Vlan"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Yes it must be trunk.

Jerry
----- Original Message -----
From: Bobby <bobby1@ctimail3.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 7:13 PM
Subject: Voice Vlan

> Hi Friends,
>
> On Cat 3550 if a port (Configured for voice vlan) is carrying both voice
and
> data
> It should not be a access port. It should be a trunk. Agree ?
>
> Now which encapuslation to use. ISL of DOT1q really confused.
>
> Thanks

Next message: mike mike: "Documentation CD Outdated"
Previous message: aansar@sscomp.com.sg: "Re: ISIS and OSPF redist"
Maybe in reply to: Bobby: "Voice Vlan"
Next in thread: Umair Hoodbhoy: "RE: Voice Vlan"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Mar 01 2003 - 11:06:34 GMT-3