RE: Voice Vlan

From: Umair Hoodbhoy (umair@cisco.com)
Date: Mon Feb 24 2003 - 23:54:57 GMT-3

• Next message: Brian Dennis: "RE: ccie lab rescore"
• Previous message: Howard C. Berkowitz: "RE: Suggestion - FAQ of CCIE Lab"
• Maybe in reply to: Bobby: "Voice Vlan"
• Next in thread: Larry Letterman: "Re: Voice Vlan"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Use dot1Q trunk. Cisco IP Phones don't support ISL. Yeah, I know, these
are Cisco devices that don't work with a Cisco protocol.

-- Umair

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Bobby
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 4:13 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Voice Vlan

Hi Friends,

On Cat 3550 if a port (Configured for voice vlan) is carrying both voice
and
data
It should not be a access port. It should be a trunk. Agree ?

Now which encapuslation to use. ISL of DOT1q really confused.

Thanks

• Next message: Brian Dennis: "RE: ccie lab rescore"
• Previous message: Howard C. Berkowitz: "RE: Suggestion - FAQ of CCIE Lab"
• Maybe in reply to: Bobby: "Voice Vlan"
• Next in thread: Larry Letterman: "Re: Voice Vlan"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Mar 01 2003 - 11:06:34 GMT-3