From: Minnick, Steve (sminnick@bcit.cc)
Date: Sat Feb 22 2003 - 16:30:35 GMT-3
Well said!
-----Original Message-----
From: Chuck Church [mailto:ccie8776@rochester.rr.com]
Sent: Sat 2/22/2003 1:52 PM
To: Aaron Woody; CCIE LAB
Cc:
Subject: Re: My Original Email...
I agree. While the designated purpose of this list is to help people pass
the CCIE lab, some of these off-topic discussions like the large OSPF design
are good. Do you just want to pass the lab, or do you want to be a highly
knowledgeable networking professional? I prefer the latter, and I hope most
of you do as well. The CCIE program does NOT teach you how to design a well
thought-out network. Knowing how to implement BVIs and virtual links in a 5
router network is good for the lab, but designing a production network like
that will have the people in TAC making fun of you. I think to become a
CCIE, you've got to have a desire to learn as much as you can about
networking. If you just want to learn the minimum, here's a better place to
get certified: www.microsoft.com . The nice part about email is it has a
subject. If I grow tired of a thread, I'll sort by subject and delete those
right off the bat. Keep in mind, this list caters to many people with a
wide range of skills and backgrounds. It's going to get off track a little
at times. But would I ever unsubscribe? Never!
Chuck Church
CCIE #8776, MCNE, MCSE
----- Original Message -----
From: "Aaron Woody" <awoody@columbus.rr.com>
To: "CCIE LAB" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Saturday, February 22, 2003 10:35 AM
Subject: My Original Email...
> I believe someone else was cussing in thread...
>
> I think the question about the OSPF 400+ was valid. There is a gray area
> around this design and I wanted others opinion who had actually used OSPF
in
> this situation. This is a group of CCIE's and wannabes right? However, the
1
> million replies was the issue. The design questions I had were answered
> within first 5 emails, but everyone continue to come up with answer not
> relevant to my original criterion. If you actually read the email I sent
it
> indicated concerns beyond basic OSPF configuration. Also, look at the OSPF
> without area 0 thread...his original question was lost very quickly
because
> everyone wants to come up with genius answers relevant or not. I am not so
> bent on asking stupid questions about the lab, I am concerned with
operation
> of Protocols, etc. that will be in the lab. Most of this stuff can be
> answered definitively reading a Doyle book or CCO.
>
> I thought you may need some clarification.
>
> Aaron...the guy who asked the "cluttering-up" design caveat question about
> OSPF hub 400+
>
> [GroupStudy removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef which had a
name of winmail.dat]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Mar 01 2003 - 11:06:29 GMT-3