From: Aaron Woody (awoody@columbus.rr.com)
Date: Sat Feb 22 2003 - 12:35:49 GMT-3
I believe someone else was cussing in thread...
I think the question about the OSPF 400+ was valid. There is a gray area
around this design and I wanted others opinion who had actually used OSPF in
this situation. This is a group of CCIE's and wannabes right? However, the 1
million replies was the issue. The design questions I had were answered
within first 5 emails, but everyone continue to come up with answer not
relevant to my original criterion. If you actually read the email I sent it
indicated concerns beyond basic OSPF configuration. Also, look at the OSPF
without area 0 thread...his original question was lost very quickly because
everyone wants to come up with genius answers relevant or not. I am not so
bent on asking stupid questions about the lab, I am concerned with operation
of Protocols, etc. that will be in the lab. Most of this stuff can be
answered definitively reading a Doyle book or CCO.
I thought you may need some clarification.
Aaron...the guy who asked the "cluttering-up" design caveat question about
OSPF hub 400+
[GroupStudy removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef which had a name of winmail.dat]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Mar 01 2003 - 11:06:29 GMT-3