RE: RIP V2 DISTANCE COMMAND

From: OhioHondo (ohiohondo@columbus.rr.com)
Date: Thu Feb 13 2003 - 11:05:32 GMT-3


Jennifer

With reference to a single classful network...
RIP v2 allows you to advertise all kinds of subnets over a single interface
(a classless type of operation) unlike RIP v1 that only allows subnets that
match the subnet of the interface.

The network command only selects which interfaces participate in RIP v1 or
RIP v2. Until recently EIGRP worked in the same manner that you are
describing. That is -- you could not be specific, it would always default to
the classful network.

I believe that it is working as designed and you will have to filter out the
routes that you do not want to advertise.

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Jennifer Bellucci
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 4:28 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RIP V2 DISTANCE COMMAND

Hi....

r1------r2-------r3

All routers are running RIP v2. R1 config is as follows:

router rip
 version 2
 passive-interface default
 no passive-interface Serial5
 network 135.25.0.0
 no auto-summary

r2 and r3 are running as similar config using net 192.131.1.0. On R1 I add
the
following interfaces:

int loop0
ip add 135.25.3.1 255.255.255.0
int loop1
ip add 135.25.36.1 255.255.255.0
int loop2
ip add 135.25.34.1 255.255.255.248

Here's the problem...I remove the network command from r1 and insert the
command 135.25.13.0, but this defaults to 135.25.0.0 in the config and rip.
This also advertises the three loopbacks I have created.
How can I stop the loopbacks being advertised?

Do I have to resort to the distance or distribute-list commands? would
off-set
list help?
I was under the impression that RIP v2 allows you to be subnet specific, am
I
wrong?

I'd appreciate any help / advice you can offer. I am probably forgetting
something very fundamental, fill me in if you can.

Thanks

Jennifer Bellucci

Jennifer_bellucci@hotmail.com
.
.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Mar 01 2003 - 11:06:21 GMT-3