From: Tony Schaffran (tschaffran@cconlinelabs.com)
Date: Mon Feb 10 2003 - 14:50:36 GMT-3
You might not want to forget the broadcast at the end of your map
statements.
Tony Schaffran
Network Analyst
CCNP, CCNA, CCDA,
NNCDS, NNCSS, CNE, MCSE
CCOnlineLabs.com
http://www.cconlinelabs.com
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Kumar, Senthil
Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 9:12 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: frame-relay Q in-arp
assuming you decide to do static mapping on a full-mesh frame topology
chosing one pvc and ignoring the other.
if the pvc is mapped to physical interface
you do
int s0/0
encap frame
no frame in-arp
ip add 10.254.251.1 255.255.255.0
frame-map ip 10.254.251.2 200
frame-map ip 10.254.251.3 200
!
>>
int s0/0
encap frame
> no frame in-arp
int s0/0.1 multipoint
>no frame in-arp
ip add 10.254.251.1 255.255.255.0
frame-map ip 10.254.251.2 200
frame-map ip 10.254.251.3 200
!
i have done no frame in-arp in physical and in the sub interfaces; is
this a
valid config, the second in-arp under the sub-int may not be required as
all
pvc's by default gets mapped to the physical interface - what do you
think..
cheers! sen
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Mar 01 2003 - 11:06:17 GMT-3