From: Dang Quang Minh (minhdq@saigonctt.com)
Date: Mon Feb 10 2003 - 15:21:29 GMT-3
If you are using physical interface
Int s0/0
Enc frame
No frame inv
frame-map ip 10.254.251.2 200
frame-map ip 10.254.251.3 200
if you are using subinterface:
int s0/0
encap frame
no frame in-arp
int s0/0.1 multipoint
ip add 10.254.251.1 255.255.255.0
frame-map ip 10.254.251.2 200
frame-map ip 10.254.251.3 200
!
by the way I don't see the broadcast keyword in ur map statement ;-)
thanks
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Kumar, Senthil
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 12:12 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: frame-relay Q in-arp
assuming you decide to do static mapping on a full-mesh frame topology
chosing one pvc and ignoring the other.
if the pvc is mapped to physical interface
you do
int s0/0
encap frame
no frame in-arp
ip add 10.254.251.1 255.255.255.0
frame-map ip 10.254.251.2 200
frame-map ip 10.254.251.3 200
!
>>
int s0/0
encap frame
> no frame in-arp
int s0/0.1 multipoint
>no frame in-arp
ip add 10.254.251.1 255.255.255.0
frame-map ip 10.254.251.2 200
frame-map ip 10.254.251.3 200
!
i have done no frame in-arp in physical and in the sub interfaces; is
this a
valid config, the second in-arp under the sub-int may not be required as
all
pvc's by default gets mapped to the physical interface - what do you
think..
cheers! sen
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Mar 01 2003 - 11:06:18 GMT-3