From: Joe Chang (changjoe@earthlink.net)
Date: Sat Feb 08 2003 - 09:34:16 GMT-3
Thanks for spotting that Aidan. Is there an addendum or revision list that
Cisco publishes with each IOS revision? I should have known about such a
list, but it never occurred to me.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Aidan Marks" <amarks@cisco.com>
To: "Thomas Stuart" <tastuart@comcast.net>
Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 2:40 AM
Subject: Re: dlsw please cast your vote
> An addition to the 12.0, 12.1 and 12.2 docs was made a few days ago (3rd
> Feb '03) to clarify any confusion:
>
> "Setting the linger option to 0 causes sessions connected to the
> backup peer to drop immediately when the primary peer recovers.
> If the linger option is omitted, all sessions connected to the
> backup peer remain active until they terminate on their own."
>
>
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122cgcr/fibm
_r1/br1fprt2/br1fdlsw.htm
>
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121cgcr/ibm_
r/brprt2/br1ddlsw.htm
>
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/12cgcr/ibm_r
/brprt2/brdlsw.htm
>
> Therefore (1) is correct, (2) is not.
>
> Aidan
>
> At 05:00 PM 8/02/2003, Thomas Stuart wrote:
>
> >all,
> >
> >i have docs from cisco, and other ccie study sites related to dlsw and
the
> >linger option.
> >
> >i do NOT know which is accurate:
> >
> >1. linger 0 = all existing sessions on the backup router IMMEDIATELY
drop
> >when primary recovers.
> >
> > or
> >
> >2. do NOT specify ANY linger option = all existing sessions on the
backup
> >router IMMEDIATELY drop when primary recovers.
> >
> >thanks,
> >
> >tom
> >.
> .
.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Mar 01 2003 - 11:06:16 GMT-3