From: Aidan Marks (amarks@cisco.com)
Date: Sat Feb 08 2003 - 23:39:48 GMT-3
Joe - AFAIK, no.
doc bugs are raised in a similar way to s/w bugs, however additions such as
the one below can take months or more likely years to make it to CCO, due
to other higher priority tasks of the documentation people. Having
specific errata updates would probably be an additional burden, so I would
suggest the story is still "always check CCO for the latest information".
We always welcome feedback and input from customers on erroneous
documentation etc. There is a email address for this, but I don't have it
handy. It should be easily found on CCO though. If not, complain! Last
time I trawled CCO there were plenty of feedback sections, so we should be
able to hear you loud and clear.
Aidan
At 11:34 PM 8/02/2003, Joe Chang wrote:
>Thanks for spotting that Aidan. Is there an addendum or revision list that
>Cisco publishes with each IOS revision? I should have known about such a
>list, but it never occurred to me.
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Aidan Marks" <amarks@cisco.com>
>To: "Thomas Stuart" <tastuart@comcast.net>
>Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 2:40 AM
>Subject: Re: dlsw please cast your vote
>
>
> > An addition to the 12.0, 12.1 and 12.2 docs was made a few days ago (3rd
> > Feb '03) to clarify any confusion:
> >
> > "Setting the linger option to 0 causes sessions connected to the
> > backup peer to drop immediately when the primary peer recovers.
> > If the linger option is omitted, all sessions connected to the
> > backup peer remain active until they terminate on their own."
> >
> >
>http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122cgcr/fibm
>_r1/br1fprt2/br1fdlsw.htm
> >
>http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121cgcr/ibm_
>r/brprt2/br1ddlsw.htm
> >
>http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/12cgcr/ibm_r
>/brprt2/brdlsw.htm
> >
> > Therefore (1) is correct, (2) is not.
> >
> > Aidan
> >
> > At 05:00 PM 8/02/2003, Thomas Stuart wrote:
> >
> > >all,
> > >
> > >i have docs from cisco, and other ccie study sites related to dlsw and
>the
> > >linger option.
> > >
> > >i do NOT know which is accurate:
> > >
> > >1. linger 0 = all existing sessions on the backup router IMMEDIATELY
>drop
> > >when primary recovers.
> > >
> > > or
> > >
> > >2. do NOT specify ANY linger option = all existing sessions on the
>backup
> > >router IMMEDIATELY drop when primary recovers.
> > >
> > >thanks,
> > >
> > >tom
> > >.
> > .
.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Mar 01 2003 - 11:06:17 GMT-3