From: Corbin, Kevin (Kevin.Corbin@LibertyMutual.com)
Date: Tue Feb 04 2003 - 20:02:26 GMT-3
Actually, I read that there is some functional difference, if the router
you configure the 0.0.0.0 statement on happens to be an ASBR and is on
a broadcast network this results in the External LSA forward address
field not being set, this is kind of nitpicking but I think a
best-practice would be to match your network statements with the
net/mask configured on the interface you want to participate to avoid
quarky little gotcha's like this.....
The article was written by Bruce Caslow, Forwarding Behavior of IGP
Routing Protocols on a Broadcast Subnets
http://www.netmasterclass.net/site/lib.php
Kevin
-----Original Message-----
From: OhioHondo [mailto:ohiohondo@columbus.rr.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 11:15 AM
To: stefan vogt; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: <no subject>
Stefan
Yes and No
If you only want one interface in OSPF and it has the IP address 1.1.1.1
then both commands will do the trick -- no functional difference.
The 1.1.1.0/24 could place many interfaces into OSPF.
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
stefan vogt
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 9:13 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: <no subject>
Hi all,
Is there any functional difference between eg.
network 1.1.1.1 0.0.0.0 area 0
and
network 1.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
when putting an interface into ospf?
-Stefan
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Mar 01 2003 - 11:06:09 GMT-3