From: Shahid Shafi (sshafi@qualcomm.com)
Date: Sun Jan 05 2003 - 09:11:16 GMT-3
Aidan,
Shouldnt no frame-relay inv-arp be the part of all frame-relay configuration
to avoid any ambiguity? what do u say?
Thanks,
Shahid
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Aidan Marks
Sent: Saturday, January 04, 2003 3:00 PM
To: kym blair
Cc: groupstudylist@execulink.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: A Frame Relay router cannot ping itself?
At 08:54 AM 5/01/2003, kym blair wrote:
[snip]
>(1) always include the "broadcast" keyword
not needed though for your local IP/dlci
>(2) After you have your frame map statements installed and the interfaces
>"no shut", make sure you haven't mapped any unwanted DLCIs: "show frame
map"
>
>If there are any "0.0.0.0" mappings, you should reboot your routers and
>let them come up clean. Actually, you should reboot the routers anyway so
>inverse-arp gets disabled.
"clear frame-relay-inarp" works for me. do you see differently?
Aidan
> You want to find frame-relay problems early before you layer all the
> IGP, BGP, IP Services, etc on top.
>
>
>HTH, Kym
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>From: Jay Greenberg <groupstudylist@execulink.com>
>>Reply-To: Jay Greenberg <groupstudylist@execulink.com>
>>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>>Subject: A Frame Relay router cannot ping itself?
>>Date: 04 Jan 2003 13:09:41 -0500
>>
>>Does anyone know how to allow a router with a frame-relay interface to
>>be able to ping it's own FR interface? This would make my ping tests
>>run a lot smoother.
>>.
>_________________________________________________________________
>MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*
>http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus
>.
.
.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Feb 01 2003 - 07:33:42 GMT-3