From: Joe Chang (changjoe@earthlink.net)
Date: Sat Jan 04 2003 - 15:17:07 GMT-3
I tried it myself, this definitely does not work
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kumar, Senthil" <senthil.kumar@intechnology.co.uk>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Saturday, January 04, 2003 2:43 PM
Subject: _concurrent frame-r physical and one sub-interface
> can i have a frame-relay physical interface configured for connectivity-a
> and a new sub-interface under the same physical for connectivity-b.
>
> this is a working config, but is this something that cisco accepts if
> used..any ideas..
>
> int s0/0
> encap frame-relay
> ip add 100.100.100.1 255.255.255.0
> ip ospf network point-to-multipoint
> no frame-inarp
> frame-relay map ip 100.100.100.2 200 broadcast
> frame-relay map ip 100.100.100.3 300 broadcast
> !
> int s0/0.1
> encap frame-relay
> ip ospf net point-to-point
> ip add 200.200.200.1 255.255.255.252
> frame-relay interface-dlci 400
> !
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> This message has been checked for all known viruses by the
> CitC Virus Scanning Service powered by SkyLabs. For further information
visit
> http://www.citc.it
>
> ___
> .
.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Feb 01 2003 - 07:33:41 GMT-3