Re: OSPF/FR: why spoke-spoke relationships try to form?

From: Marshall Stacks (catheadcatheadcathead@hotmail.com)
Date: Sun Dec 22 2002 - 18:35:11 GMT-3

Next message: Marshall Stacks: "RE: odd ISDN behavior after pasting fresh configs"
Previous message: Evgeny Tantsura: "Re: Redist into RIP"
Maybe in reply to: Marshall Stacks: "OSPF/FR: why spoke-spoke relationships try to form?"
Next in thread: Brian Dennis: "RE: OSPF/FR: why spoke-spoke relationships try to form?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Evgeny Tantsura wrote:
>
>Enable OSPF only on the interface you wont to participate in OSPF ie
>network 130.10.134.1 0.0.0.0 area <area #>

Doing that:

router ospf 1
network 130.10.30.3 0.0.0.0 area 3
network 130.10.134.3 0.0.0.0 area 0

router ospf 1
network 130.10.40.4 0.0.0.0 area 4
network 130.10.134.4 0.0.0.0 area 0

Next message: Marshall Stacks: "RE: odd ISDN behavior after pasting fresh configs"
Previous message: Evgeny Tantsura: "Re: Redist into RIP"
Maybe in reply to: Marshall Stacks: "OSPF/FR: why spoke-spoke relationships try to form?"
Next in thread: Brian Dennis: "RE: OSPF/FR: why spoke-spoke relationships try to form?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jan 17 2003 - 17:21:51 GMT-3