From: Cliff Moseley (cliffmoseley@hotmail.com)
Date: Mon Dec 09 2002 - 22:52:03 GMT-3
or try taking the secondary interface off r1....just a thought.
>From: csc david <davidcsc2002@yahoo.com.cn>
>Reply-To: csc david <davidcsc2002@yahoo.com.cn>
>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: an isdn question
>Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 13:22:52 +0800 (CST)
>
>r1-----------isdn-----------r2
>
>r1:
> > int bri0
> > ip add 2.2.2.2 255.255.255.252 second
> > ip add 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.0
> > no ip spli-hori
> > enca ppp
> > dialer map ip 10.10.10.2 name r2 br xxxx
> > dialer-group 1
> >
> > router rip
> > network 10.0.0.0
>
> network 2.0.0.0
>
>
> > r2:
> >
> > int bri0
> > ip add 10.10.10.2 255.255.255.0
> > enca ppp
> > dialer map ip 10.10.10.1 name r1 br yyyy
> > dialer-group 1
> >
> > router rip
> > network 10.0.0.0
> >
>
>if r2 wand to see the 2.0.0.0 route, does r2 need to add "dialer map ip
>2.2.2.2 name r1 br" ?
>
>thanks
>
>
>
>---------------------------------
>Do You Yahoo!?
>"JGIT>+S"Bp#?P!JTE#56;qJ1IP4s=1#!"
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jan 17 2003 - 17:21:41 GMT-3