From: Cliff Moseley (cliffmoseley@hotmail.com)
Date: Mon Dec 09 2002 - 22:39:36 GMT-3
add ip address 2.2.2.1 255.255.255.252 second on r2
>From: "Carlos" <cchorao@xtra.co.nz>
>Reply-To: "Carlos" <cchorao@xtra.co.nz>
>To: "csc david" <davidcsc2002@yahoo.com.cn>, <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: Re: an isdn question
>Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 23:30:25 +1300
>
>David,
>
>My findings on the scenario you outlined are as follows :
> 1) R2 ignores the update from R1 for net 2.2.2.0 . You can see this
>when you deb ip rip , the message goes something like this
> "ignored v1 update from bad source 2.2.2.2 on BRI0. Consequently
>net
>2.2.2.0 never added to the route table.
> 2)If I enter the "no validate-update-source" under rip on R2 , the
>update is received, the route is entered in the route table and R2 is able
>to ping the secondary without the additional dialer map statement ( the
>route table shows the dest 2.0.0.0 as reachable through 10.10.10.1)
>
>What were your findings ?
>
>Carlos
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "csc david" <davidcsc2002@yahoo.com.cn>
>To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 6:22 PM
>Subject: an isdn question
>
>
> > r1-----------isdn-----------r2
> >
> > r1:
> > > int bri0
> > > ip add 2.2.2.2 255.255.255.252 second
> > > ip add 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.0
> > > no ip spli-hori
> > > enca ppp
> > > dialer map ip 10.10.10.2 name r2 br xxxx
> > > dialer-group 1
> > >
> > > router rip
> > > network 10.0.0.0
> >
> > network 2.0.0.0
> >
> >
> > > r2:
> > >
> > > int bri0
> > > ip add 10.10.10.2 255.255.255.0
> > > enca ppp
> > > dialer map ip 10.10.10.1 name r1 br yyyy
> > > dialer-group 1
> > >
> > > router rip
> > > network 10.0.0.0
> > >
> >
> > if r2 wand to see the 2.0.0.0 route, does r2 need to add "dialer map ip
>2.2.2.2 name r1 br" ?
> >
> > thanks
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > "JGIT>+S"Bp#?P!JTE#56;qJ1IP4s=1#!"
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jan 17 2003 - 17:21:41 GMT-3