From: MOLINA, MARTIN J (PBI) (mm1343@sbc.com)
Date: Sun Dec 08 2002 - 16:05:15 GMT-3
I'm not sure if this will help but I find it easier to specify the interface
in the route-map as opposed to an ACL:
Router ospf xxx
redistribute connected subnets route-map sizzlechest
route-map sizzlechest permit 10
match interface Looback 1
This way I know Loopback 1 will be injected and I don't have to worry about
other connected interfaces getting injected unless I specify them in the
route-map. Good luck !!!
-----Original Message-----
From: John Underhill [mailto:stepnwlf@magma.ca]
Sent: Sunday, December 08, 2002 9:50 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Route map
I have an easy one for you.. Now, I believe I know the answer, and am really
looking for clarification as to why this operates in this way. I was doing a
lab yesterday that required me to advertise an interface without the network
statement in OSPF, so..
redist connected metric 1000 route-map CONNECTED
access-list 1 permit 172.16.1.0 0.0.0.255
route-map CONNECTED permit 10
match ip add 1
Now a little lator on I noticed that router advertising the loopback address
into the routing table, and so I added..
route map CONNECTED deny 20
and it was gone.. but what I am unclear on, is I thought the implicit deny
on
the access list would have summarily denied this interface, and it has not
been my habit to add this second route map statement, am I missing something
here? Does someone have a 'best practices' when using route maps
advice/link?
I appreciate it
John
.
.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jan 17 2003 - 17:21:40 GMT-3