From: John Underhill (stepnwlf@magma.ca)
Date: Sun Dec 08 2002 - 14:50:02 GMT-3
I have an easy one for you.. Now, I believe I know the answer, and am really
looking for clarification as to why this operates in this way. I was doing a
lab yesterday that required me to advertise an interface without the network
statement in OSPF, so..
redist connected metric 1000 route-map CONNECTED
access-list 1 permit 172.16.1.0 0.0.0.255
route-map CONNECTED permit 10
match ip add 1
Now a little lator on I noticed that router advertising the loopback address
into the routing table, and so I added..
route map CONNECTED deny 20
and it was gone.. but what I am unclear on, is I thought the implicit deny on
the access list would have summarily denied this interface, and it has not
been my habit to add this second route map statement, am I missing something
here? Does someone have a 'best practices' when using route maps advice/link?
I appreciate it
John
.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jan 17 2003 - 17:21:40 GMT-3