From: Chris Home (clarson52@comcast.net)
Date: Sun Dec 08 2002 - 15:05:23 GMT-3
Richard didn't violate the NDA. You came closer to doing that by raising the
issue. He did not say this was a question in his lab.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Shahid Shafi" <sshafi@qualcomm.com>
To: <richard.von.essen@ns.sigma.se>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Sunday, December 08, 2002 11:47 AM
Subject: RE: Hide Telnet Question
> Richard,
>
> I dont know you and its nothing personel but this the DIRECT violation of
> NDA. Please be careful
>
> Shahid
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> richard.von.essen@ns.sigma.se
> Sent: Sunday, December 08, 2002 8:05 AM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Hide Telnet Question
>
>
> Hi!
>
> I have been thinking about a ccie practice question about telnet.
>
> If the ask you to do the following:
>
> 7 Configure on router 2 so you can connect to router 4 loopback without
> using IP adresses
> 7 Configure so you will not see R4 ip address in the connection message
> 7 If the connection fails you should see the following messages
> "SECURITY WARNING"
>
> ALL REGULAR TELNET MESSAGES SHOULD NOT BE SEEN WHEN TELNET TO ANOTHER
> ROUTER.
>
> I would have suggested this:
>
> ip host r4 "loopback-IP"
> service hide-telnet
> busy-message r4 # SECURITY WARNING#
>
> But what about the "ALL REGULAR TELNET MESSAGES SHOULD NOT BE SEEN WHEN
> TELNET TO ANOTHER ROUTER."??????
> Is this the outcome of the previous commands or are they looking for
> something else?
>
> I'd appreciate any good suggestions.
>
> Regards
>
>
> Richard von Essen
> .
> .
.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jan 17 2003 - 17:21:40 GMT-3