From: Joe Chang (changjoe@earthlink.net)
Date: Thu Dec 05 2002 - 16:01:22 GMT-3
I thought RIP doesn't keep its own database. All it uses to store its routes
the routing table itself.
----- Original Message -----
From: "MOLINA, MARTIN J (PBI)" <mm1343@sbc.com>
To: "'Joe Martin'" <jmartin@capitalpremium.net>; "CCIE GroupStudy"
<ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 2:59 PM
Subject: RE: RIP Auto-summary
> Interesting. I have a bad habit of relying on the route table as opposed
to
> the database. As a result, I haven't spent much time reviewing the
database.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joe Martin [mailto:jmartin@capitalpremium.net]
> Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 10:54 AM
> To: MOLINA, MARTIN J (PBI); CCIE GroupStudy
> Subject: RE: RIP Auto-summary
>
>
> I was running v1 with discontiguous subnets just to see what the debugs
>
> would look like. I knew this would not work. Then I switched to v2 and
the
>
> discontiguous subnets show up in the RIP database, but so do the summary
>
> routes, even after a reload.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
> From: MOLINA, MARTIN J (PBI) [mailto:mm1343@sbc.com]
>
> Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 11:45 AM
>
> To: 'Joe Martin'; CCIE GroupStudy
>
> Subject: RE: RIP Auto-summary
>
>
>
>
>
> This might be a silly question but are you running RIP Version 2 ?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
> From: Joe Martin [mailto:jmartin@capitalpremium.net]
>
> Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 9:32 AM
>
> To: CCIE GroupStudy
>
> Subject: RIP Auto-summary
>
>
>
>
>
> Why, if I enter the "no auto-summary" command under the RIP process, do I
>
>
>
> still have summary routes at the classful boundary in the RIP database?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Maybe just a total brain fart? What am I missing?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Joe Martin
> .
.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jan 17 2003 - 17:21:39 GMT-3