From: Nathan Kleven (nkleven@intellinet.ws)
Date: Mon Nov 11 2002 - 15:29:11 GMT-3
Fair-queue enables Weighted Fair Queueing, while "BANDWIDTH" enables
Class-based Weighted Fair-queueing. You can't have both enabled in
Class-Default.
HTH
__________
Nate Kleven
Senior Network Engineer, CCNP Voice Access, MCSE
Expanets
6020 So 190th ST
Kent, WA 98032
(206)219.6135
"Experienced at Networked Solutions"
-----Original Message-----
From: Tarun Pahuja [mailto:tpahuja@hotmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 4:14 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Bandwidth statement under "class-default"
Folks,
If i define bandwith under the "class-default" statement under
policy-map, would I still be guaranteed best effort delivery. Cisco
Documetation says that if "fair-queue" is enabled under map-class then all
that data that does not match any criterain would be offered best effort
delievery. The problem is that i can not enable "fair queue" and "bandwidth"
at the same time under "class-default"
Thanks
>From: "Don" >Reply-To: "Don" >To: >Subject: Re: Multiple Compnay
Connections to Internet Via ADSL >Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 14:50:24 -0800 >
>I would suggest multiple PIX 501's here. That way you can more easily
set >up full firewall rules to each company individually with no worry of
>interaction. Of course you would still need to NAT from the multiple
501's >to the single IP address of the DSL. No really great ideas for that
except >another 501. Any chance the DSL provider will assign a block of
addresses >to the connection? If so, setting up incoming NAT connections
becomes a lot >simpler if the need or desire to do so arises in the future.
> Don > > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Peter Wodle" >To: >Cc:
>Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 1:47 PM >Subject: Multiple Compnay
Connections to Internet Via ADSL > > > > Hi All > > > > Can you please help
on this. What is a cheap way of serving around 5 (or
>may > > be 6) compnaies in the same building with say 20 PCs so that
they can > > connect to Internet with one ADSL line? They must not see each
other as >they > > are seperate companies. > > > > What I'm
thinking: > > 1) 2621 with 4E NM card. One interafce to ADSL router with
legal address > > (i.e. External LAN). Others interafces to each compnay hub
with Private IP > > addressess (i.e. internal LANs). Most private IPs to be
NATed with >overload > > on the exteranl router IP address. Some server IPs
to be NATed usind one >to > > one NAT. > > 2) Using may 2621. One interafce
to ADSL router with legal address (i.e. > > External LAN). Other internal
interafce to be trunked to a Catalyst. > > Internal FE to be sliced so that
there are as many subinterfaces as the > > companies. Cat to have as many
VLANs as companies. > > > > Does this sound ok? Aany better/cheaper way? > >
> > > > _________________________________________________________________ >
> Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online > >
http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Dec 03 2002 - 07:22:56 GMT-3