From: Tarun Pahuja (tpahuja@hotmail.com)
Date: Thu Nov 07 2002 - 21:13:57 GMT-3
Folks,
If i define bandwith under the "class-default" statement
under policy-map, would I still be guaranteed best effort delivery. Cisco
Documetation says that if "fair-queue" is enabled under map-class then
all that data that does not match any criterain would be offered best
effort delievery. The problem is that i can not enable "fair queue" and
"bandwidth" at the same time under "class-default"
Thanks
>From: "Don" >Reply-To: "Don" >To: >Subject: Re: Multiple Compnay
Connections to Internet Via ADSL >Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 14:50:24 -0800 >
>I would suggest multiple PIX 501's here. That way you can more easily
set >up full firewall rules to each company individually with no worry of
>interaction. Of course you would still need to NAT from the multiple
501's >to the single IP address of the DSL. No really great ideas for
that except >another 501. Any chance the DSL provider will assign a block
of addresses >to the connection? If so, setting up incoming NAT
connections becomes a lot >simpler if the need or desire to do so arises
in the future. > Don > > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Peter
Wodle" >To: >Cc: >Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 1:47 PM >Subject:
Multiple Compnay Connections to Internet Via ADSL > > > > Hi All > > > >
Can you please help on this. What is a cheap way of serving around 5 (or
>may > > be 6) compnaies in the same building with say 20 PCs so that
they can > > connect to Internet with one ADSL line? They must not see
each other as >they > > are seperate companies. > > > > What I'm
thinking: > > 1) 2621 with 4E NM card. One interafce to ADSL router with
legal address > > (i.e. External LAN). Others interafces to each compnay
hub with Private IP > > addressess (i.e. internal LANs). Most private IPs
to be NATed with >overload > > on the exteranl router IP address. Some
server IPs to be NATed usind one >to > > one NAT. > > 2) Using may 2621.
One interafce to ADSL router with legal address (i.e. > > External LAN).
Other internal interafce to be trunked to a Catalyst. > > Internal FE to
be sliced so that there are as many subinterfaces as the > > companies.
Cat to have as many VLANs as companies. > > > > Does this sound ok? Aany
better/cheaper way? > > > > > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Dec 03 2002 - 07:22:55 GMT-3