Re: BGP & multihoming

From: MADMAN (dave@interprise.com)
Date: Sun Nov 10 2002 - 00:11:56 GMT-3

Next message: Jay Greenberg: "Re: Ditribute-list v. route-maps"
Previous message: Neil Moore: "Re: Telnet Privilege Levels"
Maybe in reply to: Brian T. Albert: "BGP & multihoming"
Next in thread: Hamele Kassa: "Re: BGP & multihoming"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

You don't need NAT if you have your own registered address/es. No special
config required, you simply announce your public address/es

Dave

"Brian T. Albert" wrote:

> In the real world can BGP multihoming to 2 different providers be
> accomplished without NAT for the internal networks? I have found some links
> on CCO http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/459/BGP-PIX.htm that show how to do
> it with NAT, but is it possible without. If so, can someone supply some
> config examples or good links.
>
> Thanks
>
> Brian T. Albert
> brian.albert@worldnet.att.net

--
David Madland
CCIE# 2016
Sr. Network Engineer
Qwest Communications Inc.
612-664-3367
dave@interprise.com

Next message: Jay Greenberg: "Re: Ditribute-list v. route-maps"
Previous message: Neil Moore: "Re: Telnet Privilege Levels"
Maybe in reply to: Brian T. Albert: "BGP & multihoming"
Next in thread: Hamele Kassa: "Re: BGP & multihoming"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Dec 03 2002 - 07:22:56 GMT-3