From: anthony ohanusi (ohanusi@lagos.sns.slb.com)
Date: Sat Nov 09 2002 - 17:28:31 GMT-3
Configuring EtherChannel and 802.1q Trunking Between a Catalyst 2950 and a
Router (InterVLAN Routing).
See this URL example between 7200 and catalyst 2950
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/158.html
Regards
At 09:47 PM 11/9/2002, Erick B. wrote:
>Hi,
>
>For some reason my original response to this didn't
>make it...
>
>To do router -- switch -- router , each router-switch
>connection would be it's own etherchannel. The switch
>needs to be configured for channeling on the 2 ports
>connecting to router1 and also on ports going to
>router2. On the switch, this would be 2 channel groups
>w/different admin group #s. I would also set the
>channel to on as well.
>
>On the routers you would have a config like:
>
>int fastethernet0
> no ip address
> no sh
> channel-group 1
>
>int fastethernet1
> no ip address
> no sh
> channel-group 1
>
>int port-channel 1
> ip address x.x.x.x y.y.y.y
> etc...
> no sh
>
>If you're doing VLAN trunking over channel, then you
>can configure VLAN encapsulated sub's on the
>port-channel like:
>
>int port-channel 1
> no sh
>
>int port-channel 1.1
> desc vlan 1
> encaps dot1q 1
> ip address 1.x.x.x y.y.y.y
>
>int port-channel 1.2
> desc VLAN 2 -- NATIVE VLAN
> encaps dot1q 2 native
> ip address 2.x.x.x y.y.y.y
>
>--- KIP <knowledge_is_power@btopenworld.com> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Just wondering can anyone offer advice.
> >
> > Have the following topology:
> >
> > Router - Switch - Router
> >
> > configured with:
> >
> > Router (Etherchannel 2 FE) - Switch (Nothing, just
> > regular VLAN) -
> >
> > Router(Etherchannel 2 FE)
> >
> > problem is no traffic seems to go out on second
> > FE's....
> >
> > I understand that Etherchannel on Router is based
> > around and EX-OR on the
> >
> > Source/ Dest IP......
> >
> > I have tried all flavors of IP source/ dest...and no
> > traffic exits on second
> >
> > FE.....although I know Etherchannl is working as
> > when I fail one FE, its
> >
> > kicks over to second immmedaitely....thoughts ??????
> >
> >
> >
> > Also I would have expected each FE Interface to use
> > its own MAC for packets,
> >
> > so that if a switch sits in the middle, there are
> > individual MAC's against
> >
> > the port...but it appears to use a single MAC which
> > is assigned to the Port
> >
> > Channel interface...
> >
> > any advice appreciated...
> >
> > KIP
>
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do you Yahoo!?
>U2 on LAUNCH - Exclusive greatest hits videos
>http://launch.yahoo.com/u2
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Dec 03 2002 - 07:22:55 GMT-3