Re: Routing process for Secondary IP on Interface

From: Angelo De Guzman (ghie_pogi@yahoo.com)
Date: Thu Oct 24 2002 - 00:14:24 GMT-3

• Next message: Donny MATEO: "Re: Adv Router is not-reachable"
• Previous message: ccna instructor: "BGP as-path filter"
• Maybe in reply to: Ellis Chan: "Routing process for Secondary IP on Interface"
• Next in thread: a9605355: "RE: Routing process for Secondary IP on Interface"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

You can also check the split-horizon issue.

Ciao,
Angelo

--- Hansang Bae <hbae@nyc.rr.com> wrote:
> At 12:46 PM 10/22/2002 +0800, Ellis Chan wrote:
> >Dear Folks
> >
> >Is there any different for the routing
> process/route update for secondary IP
> >on an interface?
> >Cisco said there is some limitation on secondary IP
> when participate in
> >routing process, but
> >no detail explanation.
> >Thanks
>
>
> OSPF, for example, will not form adjacency on
> secondary addresses.
>
> hsb

• Next message: Donny MATEO: "Re: Adv Router is not-reachable"
• Previous message: ccna instructor: "BGP as-path filter"
• Maybe in reply to: Ellis Chan: "Routing process for Secondary IP on Interface"
• Next in thread: a9605355: "RE: Routing process for Secondary IP on Interface"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Nov 05 2002 - 08:35:55 GMT-3