RE: Routing process for Secondary IP on Interface

From: a9605355 (a9605355@graduate.hku.hk)
Date: Thu Oct 24 2002 - 00:47:09 GMT-3

• Next message: aansar@sscomp.com.sg: "Re: Adv Router is not-reachable"
• Previous message: Chris: "Re: Adv Router is not-reachable"
• Maybe in reply to: Ellis Chan: "Routing process for Secondary IP on Interface"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

as far as I know, routing update will be sent ONLY using primary ip interface
as source IP address. In other words, adjacencies can not be formed using
secondary IP interface.

regards,
alec
>===== Original Message From Angelo De Guzman <ghie_pogi@yahoo.com> =====
>You can also check the split-horizon issue.
>
>Ciao,
>Angelo
>
>--- Hansang Bae <hbae@nyc.rr.com> wrote:
>> At 12:46 PM 10/22/2002 +0800, Ellis Chan wrote:
>> >Dear Folks
>> >
>> >Is there any different for the routing
>> process/route update for secondary IP
>> >on an interface?
>> >Cisco said there is some limitation on secondary IP
>> when participate in
>> >routing process, but
>> >no detail explanation.
>> >Thanks
>>
>>
>> OSPF, for example, will not form adjacency on
>> secondary addresses.
>>
>> hsb
>
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do you Yahoo!?
>Y! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your web site
>http://webhosting.yahoo.com/

• Next message: aansar@sscomp.com.sg: "Re: Adv Router is not-reachable"
• Previous message: Chris: "Re: Adv Router is not-reachable"
• Maybe in reply to: Ellis Chan: "Routing process for Secondary IP on Interface"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Nov 05 2002 - 08:35:55 GMT-3