From: Sam Munzani (sam@zealtron.com)
Date: Fri Oct 18 2002 - 13:07:45 GMT-3
> Many reasons!?! I can think of one and that would be you are doing
> VOIP. I would then probably go with MLPPP.
1. VOIP is current initiative in this environment.
2. Customer doesn't like the idea of having 2 lines and relying on Routing protocols to do load balancing. (BIGGEST)
Sam
> Dave
>
> Sam Munzani wrote:
> >
> > That's not an option Dave. We have to bundle them for many reasons.
> >
> > Sam
> > > IMHO, neither. I like CEF, less overhead, simple config, works well.
> > >
> > > Dave
> > >
> > > Sam Munzani wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I want to bundle the 2 T1 interfaces as 1 virtual interface. On PPP links, Multilink PPP is option, On Frame Relay links, FRF.16 is an option. What's better?
> > > >
> > > > Sam
> > > >
> > > > > What is it your trying to do? IF point to point T1's then neither.
> > > > > HDLC and CEF would be fine.
> > > > >
> > > > > Dave
> > > > >
> > > > > Sam Munzani wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Group,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I have 2 T1 circuits between 2 locations. What's better configuration?
> > > > > > Multilink PPP or FRF.16(After doing back to back Frame Relay?)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Sam Munzani
> > > > > >
> > > > > > CCIE # 6479
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > David Madland
> > > > > CCIE# 2016
> > > > > Sr. Network Engineer
> > > > > Qwest Communications
> > > > > 612-664-3367
> > > > >
> > > > > "You don't make the poor richer by making the rich poorer." --Winston
> > > > > Churchill
> > > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > David Madland
> > > CCIE# 2016
> > > Sr. Network Engineer
> > > Qwest Communications
> > > 612-664-3367
> > >
> > > "You don't make the poor richer by making the rich poorer." --Winston
> > > Churchill
> > >
>
> --
> David Madland
> CCIE# 2016
> Sr. Network Engineer
> Qwest Communications
> 612-664-3367
>
> "You don't make the poor richer by making the rich poorer." --Winston
> Churchill
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Nov 05 2002 - 08:35:50 GMT-3