From: Volkov, Dmitry (Toronto - BCE) (dmitry_volkov@ca.ml.com)
Date: Fri Oct 18 2002 - 13:02:14 GMT-3
Could You please tell us what kind of reasons...besides bandwidth
aggregation/load balancing ?
Dmitry Volkov
CCIE # 10292
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sam Munzani [mailto:sam@zealtron.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 11:29 AM
> To: MADMAN
> Cc: dmadlan@qwest.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: What's better? Multilink PPP or FRF.16?
>
>
> That's not an option Dave. We have to bundle them for many reasons.
>
> Sam
> > IMHO, neither. I like CEF, less overhead, simple config,
> works well.
> >
> > Dave
> >
> > Sam Munzani wrote:
> > >
> > > I want to bundle the 2 T1 interfaces as 1 virtual
> interface. On PPP links, Multilink PPP is option, On Frame
> Relay links, FRF.16 is an option. What's better?
> > >
> > > Sam
> > >
> > > > What is it your trying to do? IF point to point T1's
> then neither.
> > > > HDLC and CEF would be fine.
> > > >
> > > > Dave
> > > >
> > > > Sam Munzani wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Group,
> > > > >
> > > > > I have 2 T1 circuits between 2 locations. What's
> better configuration?
> > > > > Multilink PPP or FRF.16(After doing back to back Frame Relay?)
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Sam Munzani
> > > > >
> > > > > CCIE # 6479
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > David Madland
> > > > CCIE# 2016
> > > > Sr. Network Engineer
> > > > Qwest Communications
> > > > 612-664-3367
> > > >
> > > > "You don't make the poor richer by making the rich
> poorer." --Winston
> > > > Churchill
> > > >
> >
> > --
> > David Madland
> > CCIE# 2016
> > Sr. Network Engineer
> > Qwest Communications
> > 612-664-3367
> >
> > "You don't make the poor richer by making the rich poorer."
> --Winston
> > Churchill
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Nov 05 2002 - 08:35:50 GMT-3