Re: What's better? Multilink PPP or FRF.16?

From: Sam Munzani (sam@zealtron.com)
Date: Fri Oct 18 2002 - 11:35:37 GMT-3

• Next message: Rah Hussain: "RE: suddenly got confused"
• Previous message: Sam Munzani: "Re: Frame Relay back-to-back on T1 CSU/DSU module"
• Maybe in reply to: Sam Munzani: "What's better? Multilink PPP or FRF.16?"
• Next in thread: MADMAN: "Re: What's better? Multilink PPP or FRF.16?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

I want to bundle the 2 T1 interfaces as 1 virtual interface. On PPP links, Multilink PPP is option, On Frame Relay links, FRF.16 is an option. What's better?

Sam

> What is it your trying to do? IF point to point T1's then neither.
> HDLC and CEF would be fine.
>
> Dave
>
> Sam Munzani wrote:
> >
> > Group,
> >
> > I have 2 T1 circuits between 2 locations. What's better configuration?
> > Multilink PPP or FRF.16(After doing back to back Frame Relay?)
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Sam Munzani
> >
> > CCIE # 6479
>
> --
> David Madland
> CCIE# 2016
> Sr. Network Engineer
> Qwest Communications
> 612-664-3367
>
> "You don't make the poor richer by making the rich poorer." --Winston
> Churchill

• Next message: Rah Hussain: "RE: suddenly got confused"
• Previous message: Sam Munzani: "Re: Frame Relay back-to-back on T1 CSU/DSU module"
• Maybe in reply to: Sam Munzani: "What's better? Multilink PPP or FRF.16?"
• Next in thread: MADMAN: "Re: What's better? Multilink PPP or FRF.16?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Nov 05 2002 - 08:35:50 GMT-3