Re: What's better? Multilink PPP or FRF.16?

From: MADMAN (dave@interprise.com)
Date: Fri Oct 18 2002 - 11:46:42 GMT-3

• Next message: Sam.MicroGate@usa.telekom.de: "RE: Labs"
• Previous message: Rah Hussain: "RE: suddenly got confused"
• Maybe in reply to: Sam Munzani: "What's better? Multilink PPP or FRF.16?"
• Next in thread: Sam Munzani: "Re: What's better? Multilink PPP or FRF.16?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

  IMHO, neither. I like CEF, less overhead, simple config, works well.

  Dave

Sam Munzani wrote:
>
> I want to bundle the 2 T1 interfaces as 1 virtual interface. On PPP links, Multilink PPP is option, On Frame Relay links, FRF.16 is an option. What's better?
>
> Sam
>
> > What is it your trying to do? IF point to point T1's then neither.
> > HDLC and CEF would be fine.
> >
> > Dave
> >
> > Sam Munzani wrote:
> > >
> > > Group,
> > >
> > > I have 2 T1 circuits between 2 locations. What's better configuration?
> > > Multilink PPP or FRF.16(After doing back to back Frame Relay?)
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Sam Munzani
> > >
> > > CCIE # 6479
> >
> > --
> > David Madland
> > CCIE# 2016
> > Sr. Network Engineer
> > Qwest Communications
> > 612-664-3367
> >
> > "You don't make the poor richer by making the rich poorer." --Winston
> > Churchill
> >

-- 
David Madland
CCIE# 2016
Sr. Network Engineer
Qwest Communications
612-664-3367
"You don't make the poor richer by making the rich poorer." --Winston
Churchill

• Next message: Sam.MicroGate@usa.telekom.de: "RE: Labs"
• Previous message: Rah Hussain: "RE: suddenly got confused"
• Maybe in reply to: Sam Munzani: "What's better? Multilink PPP or FRF.16?"
• Next in thread: Sam Munzani: "Re: What's better? Multilink PPP or FRF.16?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Nov 05 2002 - 08:35:50 GMT-3