RE: route-map problem

From: David C Prall (dcp@dcptech.com)
Date: Wed Oct 09 2002 - 13:21:03 GMT-3

Next message: Tim Fletcher: "Re: 3500+2950"
Previous message: Dean Whitley: "RE: T letter and VOIP/POTS dialer-peer patterns"
Maybe in reply to: chenyan: "route-map problem"
Next in thread: Adam Crisp: "RE: route-map problem"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

If you don't have the permit 20, then you have an implicit deny. Therefore,
only packets amtching access-list 101 will be allowed into your BGP table.

--
David C Prall dcp@dcptech.com http://dcp.dcptech.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> chenyan
> Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 12:02 PM
> To: ccielab
> Subject: route-map problem
>
>
> hi,all
>
> router bgp 1
> nei 1.1.1.1 remote 2
> nei 1.1.1.1 route-map test out
> !
> route-map test permit 10
> match ip add 101
> set local-preference 100
>
> route-map test permit 20
>
> above is one sample configuration. If there is not the second
> route-map test permit 20, how the router process the unmatched routes?
>
> Thanks

Next message: Tim Fletcher: "Re: 3500+2950"
Previous message: Dean Whitley: "RE: T letter and VOIP/POTS dialer-peer patterns"
Maybe in reply to: chenyan: "route-map problem"
Next in thread: Adam Crisp: "RE: route-map problem"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Nov 05 2002 - 08:35:43 GMT-3