From: Chris Hugo (chrishugo@yahoo.com)
Date: Tue Oct 08 2002 - 15:04:27 GMT-3
John is right,
I have also noticed that when you nail down redistribution points that it becomes a bear when you have to work out fail-over scenarios. Distance can be your friend also.
It's still good to nail down stuff but where and what to nail and how each routing protocol REACTS is the KEY point (run-on sentence). Nailing stuff like half-duplex/full-duplex, etc. is very good stuff to nail down.
hth,
chris hugo
John Neiberger wrote: The only thing you'll lose by overconfiguring is time, but it
also gives you more chances to screw up the important parts of
your config. I'd suggest keeping your config as lean as
possible. Do what is required, but no more.
John
---- On Tue, 8 Oct 2002, McClure, Allen (Allen.McClure@Tricon-
Yum.Com) wrote:
> I've noticed that in a lot of lab scenarios I'm over-doing
the config.
> I tend to nail things down a lot and put extra time into
bullet proofing
> redistribution, etc...
>
> Not looking for NDA stuff, but should I be more careful about
slimming
> down my config? I'm trying to figure out if this extra stuff
stands to
> help or hurt me.
>
> Allen McClure
> MCSE, CCNP, CCDP
> YUM! Brands, Inc.
> Sr. Network Analyst
> NEW E-Mail - mailto:allen.mcclure@yum.com
> 972-338-7494
>
>
>
> This communication is confidential and may be legally
privileged. If you are
> not the intended recipient, (i) please do not read or
disclose to others, (ii)
> please notify the sender by reply mail, and (iii) please
delete this
> communication from your system. Failure to follow this
process may be
> unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation.
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos, & more
faith.yahoo.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Nov 05 2002 - 08:35:42 GMT-3