From: Hunt Lee (huntl@webcentral.com.au)
Date: Tue Oct 01 2002 - 22:17:47 GMT-3
Hi Scott / John,
Thanks so much for the clarifications. I found the CCO page at:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/104/26.html
Regards,
Hunt Lee
-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Morris [mailto:swm@emanon.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 2 October 2002 10:09 AM
To: Hunt Lee; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: URGENT - Help needed
I'm not sure why CCO would tell you it had to be on both sides...
OSPF sends hellos to a multicast address, so the specific IP isn't any
big deal. In addition, they exchange RID's which aren't necessarily the
specific interface IP anyway. *shrug*
Every time I've done stuff with unnumbered it hasn't mattered what the
other side did either.
Scott
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Hunt Lee
Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 7:52 PM
To: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
Subject: URGENT - Help needed
Hello Group,
I was doing some reading on CCO this morning, and it stated that for
OSPF adjacency to work, if "ip unnumbered" is used, it must be used on
both sides of a link.
However, when I tried it, I managed to get OSPF still to form adjacency
even I have only used the "ip unnumbered" on one side of the link. Is
CCO wrong? Or am I missing something?
At RTA:
interface Loopback0
ip address 172.16.32.1 255.255.255.0
interface Serial0
ip unnumbered Loopback0
no fair-queue
clockrate 64000
At RTB:
interface Serial0
ip address 172.16.32.2 255.255.255.0
no fair-queue
But OSPF still works.... any ideas??
R2#sh ip ospf n
Neighbor ID Pri State Dead Time Address Interface
172.16.32.1 1 FULL/ - 00:00:39 172.16.32.1 Serial0
R2#
Hunt
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Nov 05 2002 - 08:35:36 GMT-3