From: Paglia, John (USPC.PCT.Hopewell) (JPaglia@NA2.US.ML.com)
Date: Tue Oct 01 2002 - 21:30:52 GMT-3
I dunno if it's a specific scenario that they're referring to, but in
practice I've done 'ip unnumbered' with dialer profiles only on one side of
a link more times than I can count.
John
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hunt Lee [SMTP:huntl@webcentral.com.au]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 7:52 PM
> To: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
> Subject: URGENT - Help needed
>
> Hello Group,
>
> I was doing some reading on CCO this morning, and it stated that for OSPF
> adjacency to work, if "ip unnumbered" is used, it must be used on both
> sides
> of a link.
>
> However, when I tried it, I managed to get OSPF still to form adjacency
> even
> I have only used the "ip unnumbered" on one side of the link. Is CCO
> wrong?
> Or am I missing something?
>
> At RTA:
>
> interface Loopback0
> ip address 172.16.32.1 255.255.255.0
>
> interface Serial0
> ip unnumbered Loopback0
> no fair-queue
> clockrate 64000
>
>
> At RTB:
>
> interface Serial0
> ip address 172.16.32.2 255.255.255.0
> no fair-queue
>
>
> But OSPF still works.... any ideas??
>
> R2#sh ip ospf n
>
> Neighbor ID Pri State Dead Time Address Interface
> 172.16.32.1 1 FULL/ - 00:00:39 172.16.32.1 Serial0
> R2#
>
>
> Hunt
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Nov 05 2002 - 08:35:36 GMT-3