BGP Confideration

From: rionaldi@cbn.net.id
Date: Fri Sep 20 2002 - 05:22:50 GMT-3

• Next message: IPSec: "Re: 6500 supervisor + MS-CCIE"
• Previous message: Pieter Jordaan: "3550 vs 2950"
• Next in thread: elping: "Re: BGP Confideration"
• Maybe reply: elping: "Re: BGP Confideration"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Dear Experts,

Does syncronization rule valid in sub AS inside BGP confideration?

Peer between two sub AS inside BGP confed, is it treated as EBGP or
treated as IBGP since it is still in the same major AS.

Regards,
Prio

----------------------------------------
This message was sent using CBN WebMail.

• Next message: IPSec: "Re: 6500 supervisor + MS-CCIE"
• Previous message: Pieter Jordaan: "3550 vs 2950"
• Next in thread: elping: "Re: BGP Confideration"
• Maybe reply: elping: "Re: BGP Confideration"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Oct 07 2002 - 07:43:57 GMT-3