From: elping (elpingu@acedsl.com)
Date: Thu Sep 19 2002 - 16:45:50 GMT-3
when using confederation your routes will apear to you peer withing the
same AS as EBGP..
the reson i say that is because notice how the apear in the routing
tables without enabling synchro..
now if you peer with a external peer notice how you do not have to turn
synchro to see the routes in the routing table
when i mean routing table I mean a "sho ip route"
El ping
rionaldi@cbn.net.id wrote:
> Dear Experts,
>
> Does syncronization rule valid in sub AS inside BGP confideration?
>
> Peer between two sub AS inside BGP confed, is it treated as EBGP or
> treated as IBGP since it is still in the same major AS.
>
> Regards,
> Prio
>
> ----------------------------------------
> This message was sent using CBN WebMail.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Oct 07 2002 - 07:43:58 GMT-3