From: baganini@attbi.com
Date: Fri Sep 13 2002 - 13:02:45 GMT-3
From what I understand, in the cnfiguratoin you have,
the filter will not filter out the reachability table.
It will filter out the netbios traffic that is destined
to R2. If Your "icanreach" statement were on R2, R6
will see all the hosts that R2 cam reaching, not
confirmed thoug. Then when a host on R6 want to send
traffice to a host other that CISCO on R2, the filter
will do its work at this time.
-- CCIE# 7003 Director of Research & Development thouma@cyscoexpert.comCyscoExpert, Inc. 4433 W. Touhy Ave. LincolnWood, IL 60712 info@cyscoexpert.com Ph:(847) 674-3392 FX:(847) 674-2625 > Hi, > > I also understand the same way you understand, but after reading this link > i got confuse. > > Could some body clarify this. How we can allow only a particular local > host to access to remote wan link. > > Thanks, > Beda > > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/ibsw/ibdlsw/tech/dls4_rg.htm > > Figure 4-2 shows the configuration required to allow any NetBIOS host with > a name starting with "sales" to access the WAN, but not allow any other > servers (for example, Engserv01 or Acctserv02) to access the WAN. This can > be done for security reasons or to limit the traffic across the WAN link. > By applying the access lists to the remote peers instead of the local > interfaces, you allow traffic to be locally bridged. > > Figure 4-2: Using Filtering to Limit the Broadcasts and Network Access of > Individual NetBIOS Servers > > > > At 06:02 PM 9/12/2002 -0400, Volkov, Dmitry (Toronto - BCE) wrote: > >here how I understand this: > > > >1)dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 172.17.59.137 host-netbios-out CISCO > >permits sending NETBIOS traffic from 172.17.59.69 to host CISCO through peer > >172.17.59.137 > > > >2)dlsw icanreach netbios-name CISCO > >tells all peers connected to this peer 172.17.59.69 that this local peer > >can reach host CISCO, i.e. remote peers peering with this peer won't send > >explorers to find where they can send traffic to CISCO, but will send > >traffic towards to 172.17.59.69 destined to CISCO. Other peers will know > >that CISCO is reachable via 172.17.59.69 > > > >Please correct me if I'm wrong > > > >Dmitry > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Guoqi Cui [mailto:guoqicui@yahoo.com] > > > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 5:14 PM > > > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com > > > Subject: DLSW netbios filter > > > > > > > > > Hi, Group: > > > > > > I am configuring DLSW netbios filter and have a > > > problem > > > with the operartion. > > > > > > R6-----------------R2 > > > > > > in R6: > > > > > > netbios access-list host CISCO permit CISCO > > > > > > dlsw local-peer peer-id 172.17.59.69 promiscuous > > > dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 172.17.59.137 host-netbios-out > > > CISCO > > > dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 172.17.59.138 backup-peer > > > 172.17.59.137 linger 8 > > > dlsw icanreach netbios-exclusive > > > dlsw icanreach netbios-name ABC > > > dlsw icanreach netbios-name CISCO > > > dlsw icanreach netbios-name CISCOA > > > dlsw icanreach netbios-name ACISCOA > > > dlsw bridge-group 1 > > > > > > in R2 > > > source-bridge ring-group 1000 > > > dlsw local-peer peer-id 172.17.59.137 promiscuous > > > dlsw bridge-group 1 > > > > > > I want to see only CISCO in R2, somehow I can see all > > > of them. > > > > > > r2#sh dlsw re > > > r2#sh dlsw reachability > > > DLSw Local MAC address reachability cache list > > > Mac Addr status Loc. port > > > rif > > > 0008.de81.990e FOUND LOCAL TBridge-001 > > > --no rif-- > > > > > > DLSw Remote MAC address reachability cache list > > > Mac Addr status Loc. peer > > > 0006.907f.fba0 FOUND REMOTE 172.17.59.69(2065) > > > > > > DLSw Local NetBIOS Name reachability cache list > > > NetBIOS Name status Loc. port > > > rif > > > > > > DLSw Remote NetBIOS Name reachability cache list > > > NetBIOS Name status Loc. peer > > > ABC UNCONFIRM REMOTE 172.17.59.69(2065) > > > ACISCOA UNCONFIRM REMOTE 172.17.59.69(2065) > > > CISCO UNCONFIRM REMOTE 172.17.59.69(2065) > > > CISCOA UNCONFIRM REMOTE 172.17.59.69(2065) > > > > > > > > > What is wrong with my configuration? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Guoqi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > > Do you Yahoo!? > > > Yahoo! News - Today's headlines > > > http://news.yahoo.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Oct 07 2002 - 07:43:50 GMT-3