From: Peng Zheng (zpnist@yahoo.com)
Date: Mon Sep 09 2002 - 02:29:07 GMT-3
I got this from previou reply:
In theory, one of the solutions would be to change the
distance on all EIGRP routes coming into R4 with
"distance eigrp 90 105" but it turns
out that this causes a recursive routing loop which
causes the tunnel to flap up and down (long
explanation) so that solution is no good.
I don't know why.
--- Omer Ansari <omer@ansari.com> wrote:
> Peng,
>
> when using distance cmd with ospf, you have to match
> against the RouterID
> of the route and not the next hop IP address.
>
> so in this case you could do
> distance 171 150.1.3.3 0.0.0.0 1
>
> where acl 1 matches 150.1.30.0/24
>
> i however still stick to 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 in
> the distance command,
> as in the lab it is more often that you're learning
> the route you're
> trying to manipulate via more than 1ospf router.
>
>
> also this brings up a question i have been thinking
> about..
>
> why doesn't the distance command work well under the
> eigrp configuration?
> is it because it already has two predefined AD's (90
> and 170) and ignore
> further attempts to tamper with the distance?
>
>
> On Sat, 7 Sep 2002, Peng Zheng wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm wondering why distance 171 0.0.0.0
> 255.255.255.255
> > is used under ospf in R4?
> >
> >
> > Thank you for help.
> >
> > Best Wishes,
> > Peng Zheng
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes
> > http://finance.yahoo.com
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Oct 07 2002 - 07:43:47 GMT-3