From: Manny Gonzalez (gonzalu@nyp.org)
Date: Mon Sep 09 2002 - 02:29:04 GMT-3
Okay, I think everyone MISSED the point of my original post :-))
I said "NEW IOS FEATURE" which I liked, and used my example as an example. I did
NOT have a problem uploading ACL's to my routers guys, come on, this is trivial.
I " S O M E T I M E S " have an issue with an upload... weird
terminal/connection combos, fat fingers, stupidity, etc. this is NOT the issue.
I think that the feature i talk about would be useful because you DO NOT have to
worry about anything such as a 9600 baud modem, use TFTP or not, etc. etc. :-)
Thanks for all the good input, but, I meant the "feature" not the problem...
Manny
Hansang Bae wrote:
> At 07:25 PM 9/4/2002 -0400, Manny Gonzalez wrote:
>
>>Well, bigger problem. The ACL is actuall inbound on the ONLY interface from the network. I guess I could do it from outside, but this violates all the security policies we have adhered to. I actullay do it via the CONSOLE PORT itself via OBM and it works.. but I have the buffer overrun problem.
>>The other way I do it (which is a real pain in the ass) is to do a TFTP to FLASH then do a COPY FLASH RUN .. but this takes forever on some routers (like one line every 5 seconds...)
>>Any way you cut it, it is a pain. Even doing the copy tftp run or copy flash run is problematic cause you still can have missing lines.
>
>
>
> Couple of things:
>
> 1) Use a 9600 bps modem and you won't over run you buffer! :)
> 2) Using tftp will be fine since it won't kick in until all of it has been uploaded.
> 3) Using tftp on the running configuration should not miss *any* lines. If you are missing lines, then something else is going on. I regularly tftp hundreds of lines of ACL with nary a problem.
>
> hsb
--
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Oct 07 2002 - 07:43:47 GMT-3