From: Hansang Bae (hbae@nyc.rr.com)
Date: Mon Sep 09 2002 - 05:53:22 GMT-3
At 10:29 PM 9/8/2002 -0700, Peng Zheng wrote:
>I got this from previou reply:
>In theory, one of the solutions would be to change the
>distance on all EIGRP routes coming into R4 with
>"distance eigrp 90 105" but it turns
>out that this causes a recursive routing loop which
>causes the tunnel to flap up and down (long
>explanation) so that solution is no good.
>I don't know why.
Look up Tunnel and Recursive Lookup on CCO. In a nutshell, the tunnel end point should not be learned by the routing protocol going through the tunnel. Easiest way to do this is to run a different routing protocol "inside the tunnel."
hsb
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Oct 07 2002 - 07:43:47 GMT-3