From: ted.mcdermott@exeloncorp.com
Date: Tue Sep 03 2002 - 15:19:32 GMT-3
Cade,
The only thing that I can think of is that using CAM you might be
able to lock down traffic such that it doesn't impact anything except the
source and destination stations. It would be a good solution to a layer-two
only switch where a lot of traffic came in the source port, and you wanted
to avoid it from impacting the other stations on the switch. Perhaps, a
heavy-duty multicast or broadcast could be contained that way. Anyone know
how to do this?
Ted
-----Original Message-----
From: Cade Wagner [mailto:cwagner@logosinc.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2002 1:20 PM
To: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
Subject: FW: set cam / span
The question of using CAM and SPAN together was posed some time ago,
and I don't think that there was a good answer at the time. Does anyone
have a good answer now? Just can't seem to understand why you should
statically set CAM Macs when using SPAN as some have recommended. Thanks in
advance.
Cade
-----Original Message-----
From: avantus1@hotmail.com [mailto:avantus1@hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 10:02 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: set cam / span
Hi, all
Could anyone explain the reason why I should set cam permanent when
configuring span?
any help would be appreciated.
thanks in advance
BS Kang.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Oct 07 2002 - 07:43:42 GMT-3