From: Michael Smith (michael.smith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Aug 06 2002 - 14:28:29 GMT-3
If you read the job description though, They are asking for the world. They
want someone to fully redesign their infrastructure, make sure it will be up
"99.999%" of the time and then design a front end for information using
Visual Basic, as well as work as a break/fix person. I agree, maybe they
think a CCIE would leave to soon. Maybe they don't have a clue what they
are talking about. Or maybe the department head doesn't want to bring in
someone better then himself.
-----Original Message-----
From: Colin Barber [mailto:Colin.Barber@telewest.co.uk]
Sent: Monday, August 05, 2002 10:59 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Anti-CCIE's ?
Maybe the job is not challenging enough for a CCIE and the employer knows
that a CCIE would soon look for another job, or that a CCIE would only be
taking the job to get work whilst still looking for something better?
-----Original Message-----
From: Jake [mailto:jakeczyz@yahoo.com]
Sent: 06 August 2002 02:17
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: OT: Anti-CCIE's ?
Sorry about the OT, but here's a question relevant to most of us:
Why do you suppose a company would post a job and specifically say that
they don't
want to hear from any CCIE's? I'm a little surprised and outraged by this.
Are there so
many CCIE's in Chicago looking for work (other than yours truly) that they
need to put
this stipulation in the description to keep a few hundred otherwise
unqualified CCIE's
from flooding their recruiters' mail boxes? Has the telecom deep-6 left this
field that
damaged? Has the credential now become a liability on my resume?
<http://www.chicago.computerjobs.com/job_view.asp?jobid=1418164>
Any thoughts?
Jake
9102
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:48:17 GMT-3