From: P729 (p729@xxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Jul 26 2002 - 01:40:34 GMT-3
Ted,
This form of an extended access-list is specifying that the subnet mask in
the update must be 255.0.0.0 and the 0.0.0.0 wildcard mask for it means it
must be an exact match.
Regards,
Mas Kato
https://ecardfile.com/id/mkato
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ted McDermott" <tedmcdermott@yahoo.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 8:27 PM
Subject: Simple Question on Extended Access Lists
> On page 2 of 10 of the Cisco - BGP Case Studies
> Section 3
> (http:/www.cisco.com/warp/customer/459/15.html), the
> author uses "access-list 101 permit ip 160.0.0.0
> 0.255.255.255 255.0.0.0 0.0.0.0" to permit
> 160.0.0.0/8. The 255.0.0.0 as a destination address
> doesn't make any sense. It ought to be 0.0.0.0. Right
> or wrong? Thanks, Ted
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:36:45 GMT-3