From: Anthony Pace (anthonypace@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Jul 26 2002 - 19:16:13 GMT-3
Mas Kato,
Are there any Cisco references that explain the more elaborate flavors
of these kinds of "filter exetnded ACLs" also which protocoles use it
to mean network + mask and which use it for neighbor + network..
Anthony Pace
On Thu, 25 Jul 2002 21:40:34 -0700, "P729" <p729@cox.net> said:
> Ted,
>
> This form of an extended access-list is specifying that the subnet mask
> in
> the update must be 255.0.0.0 and the 0.0.0.0 wildcard mask for it means
> it
> must be an exact match.
>
> Regards,
>
> Mas Kato
> https://ecardfile.com/id/mkato
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ted McDermott" <tedmcdermott@yahoo.com>
> To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 8:27 PM
> Subject: Simple Question on Extended Access Lists
>
>
> > On page 2 of 10 of the Cisco - BGP Case Studies
> > Section 3
> > (http:/www.cisco.com/warp/customer/459/15.html), the
> > author uses "access-list 101 permit ip 160.0.0.0
> > 0.255.255.255 255.0.0.0 0.0.0.0" to permit
> > 160.0.0.0/8. The 255.0.0.0 as a destination address
> > doesn't make any sense. It ought to be 0.0.0.0. Right
> > or wrong? Thanks, Ted
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:36:45 GMT-3