From: Ted McDermott (tedmcdermott@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Jul 26 2002 - 00:27:20 GMT-3
On page 2 of 10 of the Cisco - BGP Case Studies
Section 3
(http:/www.cisco.com/warp/customer/459/15.html), the
author uses "access-list 101 permit ip 160.0.0.0
0.255.255.255 255.0.0.0 0.0.0.0" to permit
160.0.0.0/8. The 255.0.0.0 as a destination address
doesn't make any sense. It ought to be 0.0.0.0. Right
or wrong? Thanks, Ted
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:36:44 GMT-3