RE: OSPF routes in database not in route table

From: Gyo (Gabor.Gyori@xxxxxx)
Date: Tue Jul 16 2002 - 10:20:37 GMT-3

• Next message: Fanglo MA: "Re: RIP with neigbor command"
• Previous message: Bob Dixon: "Re: Is there IS-IS in the CIsco LAB"
• Maybe in reply to: Ademola Osindero: "OSPF routes in database not in route table"
• Next in thread: Krucker, Louis: "RE: OSPF routes in database not in route table"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

   
OSPF hello and dead interval parameters has to be the same on neighbor routers
in order to form adjacency.

Gabor

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ademola Osindero [mailto:osindero@lagos.sns.slb.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 6:57 AM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: OSPF routes in database not in route table
>
>
> Hi group,
>
> Can there be any reason why a route existing in an OSPF
> database will not
> be installed in the route table?
>
> While practicing Cyscoexeprt lab, I mad routers r2, r5 and r6
> to have ip
> ospf net non-broadcast and also configured there neighbors'
> addresses. This
> was all in the quest to modify the dead interval to 120seconds. But
> apparently no ospf route was installed on r2 except for
> routes emanating
> from r1. Could there be any reason for this?
>
> Regards,
>
> Osindero Ademola
> Schlumberger Network Solutions
> Tel: 234 1 261 0446 Ext 5427
> Fax 234 1 262 1034
> email:osindero@lagos.sns.slb.com

• Next message: Fanglo MA: "Re: RIP with neigbor command"
• Previous message: Bob Dixon: "Re: Is there IS-IS in the CIsco LAB"
• Maybe in reply to: Ademola Osindero: "OSPF routes in database not in route table"
• Next in thread: Krucker, Louis: "RE: OSPF routes in database not in route table"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:36:32 GMT-3